Jan Vogel
commented
in reference to scenery pack
42040on December 30, 2015 7:53 AM
Finally a nicely made, high-quality airport. I used it today for the first time and I was very impressed with your quality, thanks for your nice contribution!
Keep up the good work, all the best, Litjan
orlandja
commented
in reference to scenery pack
45518on December 29, 2016 11:24 PM
I messed up here. I worked off 91031, edited it locally and submitted it as 99301, now approved/recommended.
I then made some more changes and submitted again, not realizing that if I didn't re-download from the scenery gateway, the scenery would be tied to the original 91031 ID, or at least that's what seems to have happened. I've since uploaded it again after modifying the "Scenery ID" to reflect 99301, which was my starting point for this latest set of updates, and after submission, WED now shows 99880. That doesn't seem to have happened by itself last time somehow.
FlyMunich
commented
in reference to scenery pack
105193on March 23, 2025 12:48 PM
Terminal A at KEWR is open since two years now and probably has some updated information available. E.g. the widebody stands (2A, 4A, 6A, 8A, 11A, 18A, 20A, 22A, 26A, 28A, 30A, 32A, 34A) are not aligned with what can be seen on ortho imagery, and taxiways around the terminal also do not reflect the real world status. Would someone be able to adjust?
Was the taxiway surface discontinuity in the vicinity of the A/B to S/R transitions? If so, thank you -- I never noticed that when I was working on it, and had been meaning to fix it when someone pointed it out!
Julien Coquel
commented
in reference to scenery pack
105193on April 13, 2025 7:35 AM
FlyMunich, I agree with you but I was not able to find an up-to-date satellite imagery to create the new taxiway layout and new stands around old demolished terminal A (hardstand Amelia). This airport area is quite new (and some parts still under construction), a little patience is needed before getting new satellite pics. However you are right about widebody stands around new terminal A, I keep that in mind for next update.
Ryan, yes exactly, the discontinuity was from A/S and B/R transition until intersection M, you can clearly see it on the fourth screenshot posted here by Julian.
You must be logged in to participate in the discussion
Finally a nicely made, high-quality airport. I used it today for the first time and I was very impressed with your quality, thanks for your nice contribution! Keep up the good work, all the best, Litjan
Outstanding work!
I messed up here. I worked off 91031, edited it locally and submitted it as 99301, now approved/recommended.
I then made some more changes and submitted again, not realizing that if I didn't re-download from the scenery gateway, the scenery would be tied to the original 91031 ID, or at least that's what seems to have happened. I've since uploaded it again after modifying the "Scenery ID" to reflect 99301, which was my starting point for this latest set of updates, and after submission, WED now shows 99880. That doesn't seem to have happened by itself last time somehow.
Terminal A at KEWR is open since two years now and probably has some updated information available. E.g. the widebody stands (2A, 4A, 6A, 8A, 11A, 18A, 20A, 22A, 26A, 28A, 30A, 32A, 34A) are not aligned with what can be seen on ortho imagery, and taxiways around the terminal also do not reflect the real world status. Would someone be able to adjust?
Was the taxiway surface discontinuity in the vicinity of the A/B to S/R transitions? If so, thank you -- I never noticed that when I was working on it, and had been meaning to fix it when someone pointed it out!
FlyMunich, I agree with you but I was not able to find an up-to-date satellite imagery to create the new taxiway layout and new stands around old demolished terminal A (hardstand Amelia). This airport area is quite new (and some parts still under construction), a little patience is needed before getting new satellite pics. However you are right about widebody stands around new terminal A, I keep that in mind for next update.
Ryan, yes exactly, the discontinuity was from A/S and B/R transition until intersection M, you can clearly see it on the fourth screenshot posted here by Julian.