Apologies, the correct Scenery Pack ID in question is 66701 (at LEMI) by artist Sirious and NOT 66071 by truxartis.
Sirious
commented
in reference to scenery pack
66701on May 10, 2019 7:09 PM
Hi, I've been traveling for more than fifteen days and I just saw these comments.
As far as I know, until LR publishes a new version of X-Plane 11, which includes the Murcia Region LEMI airport, as a valid airport, it will not appear in the Global Airport database and therefore, the GPS Garmin 530 will not admit it as a valid airport.
If the cause was, some error in the custom scenario that I have uploaded to Gateway, you can tell me what is necessary to make the corresponding modification.
When the LEMI airport is accepted by LR, I will add other features that I have made, changing the objects of the terminal and other buildings, as well as, the horizontal information of all the parking places, as well as a new track designed as it is in the reality, in accordance with the Spanish regulations published by Aena in its day.
I only have one question and it is, if Laminar will accept new textures created by me for this purpose.
Regards.
This once agains highlights the need for scenery designers to “protect” their airports against third-party meshes by placing exclusion zones - even if no offending trees/objects appear when used together with default XPlane mesh.
I have amended the (very nice) latest version to include exclusion zones and also remove the “always flatten”. Yes, there is a little bump on the runway, but it doesn´t make it unusable (and will be even better after next scenery recut which will smooth out the area). Property should only be used when runway is unusable without it.
You must be logged in to participate in the discussion
I can not upload the modification of LEMI's scenery, because it says that version 11 for x-plane, is invalid.
Made with WED 1.7.2 (WorldEditor 1.7.21r1, compliled on jan 8 2019 21:09:35) My version of X-Plane: 11.25r2
Can I send the files to you through another system? Thanks and regards. Sirious
Suspect this problem is related to XSG-7628: LOC and GS missing.
truxartis May 9, 2019 11:06 PM
Please close bug due to wrong/transcribed ID
cessna729 May 9, 2019 11:57 PM
Apologies, the correct Scenery Pack ID in question is 66701 (at LEMI) by artist Sirious and NOT 66071 by truxartis.
Hi, I've been traveling for more than fifteen days and I just saw these comments. As far as I know, until LR publishes a new version of X-Plane 11, which includes the Murcia Region LEMI airport, as a valid airport, it will not appear in the Global Airport database and therefore, the GPS Garmin 530 will not admit it as a valid airport. If the cause was, some error in the custom scenario that I have uploaded to Gateway, you can tell me what is necessary to make the corresponding modification. When the LEMI airport is accepted by LR, I will add other features that I have made, changing the objects of the terminal and other buildings, as well as, the horizontal information of all the parking places, as well as a new track designed as it is in the reality, in accordance with the Spanish regulations published by Aena in its day. I only have one question and it is, if Laminar will accept new textures created by me for this purpose. Regards.
Forest appears throughout the airport, on the apron, on the taxiways and on the runways
Jan Vogel March 13, 2021 7:28 AM
Reporter has checked out the airport, he will hopefully fix it.
cjreed May 10, 2021 10:59 PM
Investigated the issue and it's not an issue when Default X-Plane scenery/overlays are used (see attached screenshot)
Probable that issue reporter has a 3rd party overlay or scenery (e.g. SpainUHD or X-Europe) - which is where the fault would be.
cjreed May 10, 2021 11:01 PM
I'd therefore suggest the issue be closed.
Jan Vogel May 11, 2021 5:59 AM
This once agains highlights the need for scenery designers to “protect” their airports against third-party meshes by placing exclusion zones - even if no offending trees/objects appear when used together with default XPlane mesh.
I have amended the (very nice) latest version to include exclusion zones and also remove the “always flatten”. Yes, there is a little bump on the runway, but it doesn´t make it unusable (and will be even better after next scenery recut which will smooth out the area). Property should only be used when runway is unusable without it.