Alistair Brown reported issue XSG-2146: Terrain and boundary in reference to scenery pack 45008 on November 20, 2016 12:49 PM
Closed

RKSI - severe terrain problems and underlying landclass showing through

  • Michael Minnhaar November 21, 2016 11:14 AM


    Hi alligator
    The landclass cannot be changed by the gateway airport - it is defined when the global base scenery is built. So this will be corrected when the new XP11 global scenery is released.
    And I choose to not put too many ground polygons down to cover up some not so solidly green areas, as these areas are already quite green and not too obvious of a mismatch.
    On the terrain issues - I'm not sure what you mean by that - the active airport area is flat already and does not seem to require any flatten switch.
    Michael

  • Jan Vogel February 23, 2021 5:55 PM

    Several updates to this airport since then - this report can be closed.

DNeely reported issue XSG-9120: Minor taxiroute issue at RKSI in reference to scenery pack 68283 on November 19, 2019 4:37 PM
Closed

The airport has multiple F class gates, and F class taxi routes. None of the runways are F class. According to the charts, all three should be.

  • BG Kim December 6, 2019 7:29 AM


    From googling, there is no difference in the runway width (60 m) between the two classes. Only the runway/taxiway distance is slightly larger as 182 m (E) to 190 m (F). According to the chart, the distance is 192 m for this airport. Hence, nothing appears wrong.

  • Jan Vogel March 6, 2021 5:01 PM

    I think the issue here was that the RUNWAY is not size F. So even if the rest of the airports (which is really nice, btw) supports size F aircraft, the runway won´t.

    So if a size F aircraft gets included (A380) with Xplane, it cant use the runways.

BG Kim reported issue XSG-12117: CFP data needs to be update... in reference to scenery pack 83456 on July 1, 2021 8:27 AM
Closed

Trying to upload a new version to reflect the changes, WED issues a CFP error that saying runway 16/34 missing. That runway designation is changed to 16L/34R from this June. And a new runway 16R/34L is now operational. Please correct this false error.

  • Julian Lockwood July 6, 2021 10:32 PM

    CIFP data will be refreshed in the next version of X-Plane. In the interim we have to abide by the existing data when creating airports for the Gateway.

  • Northeastern292 October 21, 2021 12:00 AM


    I will second this. Does the CIFP data update have to wait for XP12? Is it hard-wired? (i.e. like approaches in legacy MSFS?)

Kreiselkompass reported issue XSG-13692: Wrong runway designator in reference to scenery pack 83456 on November 13, 2022 9:09 AM
Closed

The scenery includes a runway 16/34 and a runway 16R/34L. The former should be changed to 16L/34R. At the moment this is causing problems with some add-ons (ToLiss A319).

  • XPJavelin November 18, 2022 5:31 PM


    Solved by submission 93258 by XPJavelin November 18, 2022 6:31 PM

You must be logged in to participate in the discussion