Applies to both rwy ends. Moving thresholds and the whole rest of the airport to match the "CIFP"-markings and also changing the length to 7236 ft (according to Jeppesen 11-DEC-20 sheet 10-9) it is turning out that all assets match the openstreetmap SlippeMap much better than with ESRi (as actually is with ID 102207).
Conclusion: CIFP heading matches osm data very well, but threshols are neither shown on sattelite imageries nor mentioned or shon on the Jeppesen sheet.
ILS LOC\GS 109.7 (old) OR 110.7(new) ARE NOT WORKING
Robin Peel November 11, 2019 8:03 PM
Thanks! The update to SKPS ILS 20 will be included in the next release of X-Plane that includes updated ILS data. - Robin
The runway cant be used for T/O or landing because it appears a hard slope change in the middle of it.
Jan Vogel March 11, 2023 7:12 AM
Runway seems fine in XP12
Applies to both rwy ends. Moving thresholds and the whole rest of the airport to match the "CIFP"-markings and also changing the length to 7236 ft (according to Jeppesen 11-DEC-20 sheet 10-9) it is turning out that all assets match the openstreetmap SlippeMap much better than with ESRi (as actually is with ID 102207).
Conclusion: CIFP heading matches osm data very well, but threshols are neither shown on sattelite imageries nor mentioned or shon on the Jeppesen sheet.
Attached: modified version as described above
Philipp Ringler June 19, 2024 3:36 PM
The chart you are referring to is four years old.
CIFP data matches current Jeppesen charts of May 16th, 2024.
PL4 June 19, 2024 8:25 PM
Thanks for the hint. Just got the Jepp. update