AndersenBali
commented
in reference to scenery pack
56910on March 28, 2018 1:24 PM
98% of all taxi signs are missing.
PL4
commented
in reference to scenery pack
97470on October 15, 2023 4:08 PM
I will (hopefully soon) upload another intermediate version. I am trying to safe CleverestEU's work, which already made plenty of details but is far from complete. The next version will be better aligned to ESRi imagery. Merged some of iFlying0425 taxiway markings and boundaries, which mostly was already aligned to ESRi. Good alignement could be a base to cooperative merge work of others.
CleverestEU
commented
in reference to scenery pack
100991on March 5, 2024 1:03 PM
That is absolutely the cutest Changi Jewel ever :) It is a shame that the sim doesn't actually render the levels with the same granularity as used in the design (with 1m height increases between the shells) but that is indeed the best use of "non-terminal-kit-facade" I've seen in some time. You can definitely tell what the building is impersonating.
pedromagueija
commented
in reference to scenery pack
101935on April 25, 2024 12:45 PM
I have a "step" like elevation at taxiway Bravo and severe terrain depressions at the threshold of RWY 02R. Perhaps this airport could benefit from flattening?
PL4
commented
in reference to scenery pack
100991on April 26, 2024 8:52 AM
@pedromeguelia Still applies. Flattening needs to be thoroughly checked, because of plenty of drainage channels which may then appear on the surface of taxiways crossing those channels.
You must be logged in to participate in the discussion
98% of all taxi signs are missing.
I will (hopefully soon) upload another intermediate version. I am trying to safe CleverestEU's work, which already made plenty of details but is far from complete. The next version will be better aligned to ESRi imagery. Merged some of iFlying0425 taxiway markings and boundaries, which mostly was already aligned to ESRi. Good alignement could be a base to cooperative merge work of others.
That is absolutely the cutest Changi Jewel ever :) It is a shame that the sim doesn't actually render the levels with the same granularity as used in the design (with 1m height increases between the shells) but that is indeed the best use of "non-terminal-kit-facade" I've seen in some time. You can definitely tell what the building is impersonating.
I have a "step" like elevation at taxiway Bravo and severe terrain depressions at the threshold of RWY 02R. Perhaps this airport could benefit from flattening?
@pedromeguelia Still applies. Flattening needs to be thoroughly checked, because of plenty of drainage channels which may then appear on the surface of taxiways crossing those channels.