Raffles reported issue XSG-10410: Gateway CIFP data wrong in reference to scenery pack 52396 on May 25, 2020 7:20 AM
Closed

I am updating this airport but it won't validate, saying that the threshold of Runway 26 is not within 10M of the location mandated by gateway CIFP data. I checked the gateway CIFP data against the official AIP co-ordinates here >>> https://www.sia-enna.dz/PDF/AIP/AD/AD2/DAAT/AD.pdf , as well as on the latest ArcGis satellite picture, and it is clear that the gateway CIFP data is incorrect.

  • Michael Minnhaar May 29, 2020 6:19 AM

    Laminar does not maintain CIFP data.
    Please report your findings to Jeppesen - that's where the gateway data comes from.

  • Raffles June 3, 2020 11:32 PM


    How often does X-plane update this data? My CIFP data says 2018 was the last update. I'm quite willing to tell Jeppesen of the error and they will likely fix it since I have a real world Jeppesen subscription and I fly a real world airliner in the region.

  • Raffles June 3, 2020 11:32 PM


    How often does X-plane update this data? My CIFP data says 2018 was the last update. I'm quite willing to tell Jeppesen of the error and they will likely fix it since I have a real world Jeppesen subscription and I fly a real world airliner in the region.

Raffles reported issue XSG-10411: ILS position incorrect in reference to scenery pack 52396 on May 25, 2020 7:32 AM
Closed

The ILS position is incorrect according to the latest ArcGis imagery, and threshold co-ordinates given in the official AIP suppement >>> https://www.sia-enna.dz/PDF/AIP/AD/AD2/DAAT/AD.pdf
The co-ordinates should be
22.795397069
5.444032560
the localizer heading is correct

  • Philipp Ringler November 6, 2020 3:02 AM

    This was filed before 11.50 data update took effect. If this is still incorrect in 11.50r3, file a new bug.

You must be logged in to participate in the discussion