mattyp79 reported issue XSG-654: EGSS Runway number discrepancy on April 14, 2015 6:04 PM
Closed

http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=85582#entry913013

The discussion on the forum highlights the problem I found. The RWYs at EGSS are 04/22. In the default airport of XP10, it comes up with a combination of 04/22 and 05/23. In the forum thread a user, Cessna729, explains the solution. If this could be implemented for the next upgrade that would be cool. I have attached the same files I posted to show the discrepancy I found.

Kind Regards

Matty

  • An unknown user April 15, 2015 10:27 AM

    @bsupnik, this is a one-line fix in the Aerosoft scenery pack's apt.dat file. Mind pointing me toward the location of these custom scenery packs in the codebase?

  • An unknown user April 15, 2015 1:42 PM

    This will be fixed in the next release of X-Plane.

    Thanks!

AustenC reported issue XSG-8929: Building outside 04 airport... on October 13, 2019 11:16 AM
Closed

There is a new college outside the airport, it would be great to see it possibly added, if that is possible, I just thought it would be cool to have it added in

  • Jan Vogel March 6, 2021 9:41 AM

    Buildings outside airports should not be added in general. There may be some leeway for buildings that are related to the airport (like a freight center or parking lot serving the airport).

Antb1 reported issue XSG-8950: Facade height of 90m at EGSS in reference to scenery pack 58432 on October 17, 2019 4:45 PM
Closed

apron D - Stand 61

  • Jan Vogel March 6, 2021 10:09 AM

    Fixed by new airport upgrades.

Antb1 commented on October 17, 2019 4:44 PM

There is an issue with one of the facades Apron D Gate 61. Facade height is 90m for some reason

https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/192899-default-egss-issue/

Antb1 commented in reference to scenery pack 58432 on October 17, 2019 4:45 PM
sstoeckle commented on October 17, 2019 5:46 PM

Working on an update

Antb1 commented in reference to scenery pack 72736 on December 1, 2019 6:34 PM

much needed update. great work. thanks

An unknown user reported issue XSG-11083: Taxiway Edge Lighting in reference to scenery pack 79386 on November 15, 2020 6:32 PM
Closed

The majority of taxiways at London Stansted don't have blue edge lighting (as per the UK AIP).

  • David C March 9, 2021 8:20 AM


    Lighting checked and redrawn in pack 81695, approved 7 Jan 2021. This bug report can be closed.

  • Jan Vogel March 12, 2021 9:19 AM

    Thanks for the fix!

David C commented in reference to scenery pack 81695 on January 7, 2021 9:19 PM

Newly revised scenery pack updated lighting in line with AIP. This bug report can be closed.

Antb1 reported issue XSG-12387: Radio Frequencies Invalid a... on October 4, 2021 2:02 PM
Closed

Radio frequencies are invalid and WED won't allow an export when trying to unflatten. Also, why is the aerodrome flattened? never used to be.

  • Jan Vogel October 25, 2021 4:52 PM

    Checked frequencies (removed one ATIS set to CLN VOR, dont add these!!) - and also removed “always flatten” it is not necessary for this airport.

scooba_steve commented in reference to scenery pack 88726 on January 9, 2022 9:15 PM

I didn't edit Taxi V so it must have been there in the previous version.

Antb1 commented in reference to scenery pack 87431 on June 9, 2022 7:04 PM

thanks for unflattening Jan! I was sad when it was flattened

joka66 commented in reference to scenery pack 102116 on May 18, 2024 5:19 PM

is the centerline supposed to be missing in the middle of the runway? it is present closer to the threshold on both sides though

Stefan Frank reported issue XSG-15406: Two runways (04C/22C and 04... in reference to scenery pack 102116 on May 20, 2024 11:20 AM
Closed

imho 04C/22C should be ignored for the Gateway, although it exists in the CIFP data. Physically rwy 04C/22C is the same rwy as 04/22 but with a reduced length.

i'd like to get clarification on this. And also if there's a better way in WED to handle this case.

UK AIP link: https://www.aurora.nats.co.uk/htmlAIP/Publications/2024-05-16-AIRAC/html/eAIP/EG-AD-2.EGSS-en-GB.html#AD-2.EGSS

  • Stefan Frank August 18, 2024 8:43 AM


    with the XP 12.1.2beta release users are now confused to see 04C/22C in the FMS which is not an actual runway.

  • ChrixFlyer August 18, 2024 10:27 AM


    They might be confused, but that's how the current situation at London Stansted looks like...
    There are procedures available for both 04/22 and 04C/22C. No short-term solution available I'm afraid unless NATS revises this situation.

Stefan Frank commented in reference to scenery pack 102116 on May 20, 2024 11:15 AM

this is due to the 'logical only' rwy 04C/22C which sits on top of the physical rwy 04/22. See https://www.aurora.nats.co.uk/htmlAIP/Publications/2024-05-16-AIRAC/html/eAIP/EG-AD-2.EGSS-en-GB.html#AD-2.EGSS

My initial submission with rwy 04/22 only got rejected.

You must be logged in to participate in the discussion