The discussion on the forum highlights the problem I found. The RWYs at EGSS are 04/22. In the default airport of XP10, it comes up with a combination of 04/22 and 05/23. In the forum thread a user, Cessna729, explains the solution. If this could be implemented for the next upgrade that would be cool. I have attached the same files I posted to show the discrepancy I found.
@bsupnik, this is a one-line fix in the Aerosoft scenery pack's apt.dat file. Mind pointing me toward the location of these custom scenery packs in the codebase?
There is a new college outside the airport, it would be great to see it possibly added, if that is possible, I just thought it would be cool to have it added in
Buildings outside airports should not be added in general. There may be some leeway for buildings that are related to the airport (like a freight center or parking lot serving the airport).
imho 04C/22C should be ignored for the Gateway, although it exists in the CIFP data. Physically rwy 04C/22C is the same rwy as 04/22 but with a reduced length.
i'd like to get clarification on this. And also if there's a better way in WED to handle this case.
They might be confused, but that's how the current situation at London Stansted looks like...
There are procedures available for both 04/22 and 04C/22C. No short-term solution available I'm afraid unless NATS revises this situation.
Stefan Frank
commented
in reference to scenery pack
102116on May 20, 2024 11:15 AM
http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=85582#entry913013
The discussion on the forum highlights the problem I found. The RWYs at EGSS are 04/22. In the default airport of XP10, it comes up with a combination of 04/22 and 05/23. In the forum thread a user, Cessna729, explains the solution. If this could be implemented for the next upgrade that would be cool. I have attached the same files I posted to show the discrepancy I found.
Kind Regards
Matty
An unknown user April 15, 2015 10:27 AM
@bsupnik, this is a one-line fix in the Aerosoft scenery pack's apt.dat file. Mind pointing me toward the location of these custom scenery packs in the codebase?
An unknown user April 15, 2015 1:42 PM
This will be fixed in the next release of X-Plane.
Thanks!
There is a new college outside the airport, it would be great to see it possibly added, if that is possible, I just thought it would be cool to have it added in
Jan Vogel March 6, 2021 9:41 AM
Buildings outside airports should not be added in general. There may be some leeway for buildings that are related to the airport (like a freight center or parking lot serving the airport).
apron D - Stand 61
Jan Vogel March 6, 2021 10:09 AM
Fixed by new airport upgrades.
There is an issue with one of the facades Apron D Gate 61. Facade height is 90m for some reason
https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/192899-default-egss-issue/
Apron D - Gate 61 facade height is 90m:
https://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/192899-default-egss-issue/
Working on an update
much needed update. great work. thanks
The majority of taxiways at London Stansted don't have blue edge lighting (as per the UK AIP).
David C March 9, 2021 8:20 AM
Lighting checked and redrawn in pack 81695, approved 7 Jan 2021. This bug report can be closed.
Jan Vogel March 12, 2021 9:19 AM
Thanks for the fix!
Newly revised scenery pack updated lighting in line with AIP. This bug report can be closed.
Radio frequencies are invalid and WED won't allow an export when trying to unflatten. Also, why is the aerodrome flattened? never used to be.
Jan Vogel October 25, 2021 4:52 PM
Checked frequencies (removed one ATIS set to CLN VOR, dont add these!!) - and also removed “always flatten” it is not necessary for this airport.
I didn't edit Taxi V so it must have been there in the previous version.
thanks for unflattening Jan! I was sad when it was flattened
is the centerline supposed to be missing in the middle of the runway? it is present closer to the threshold on both sides though
imho 04C/22C should be ignored for the Gateway, although it exists in the CIFP data. Physically rwy 04C/22C is the same rwy as 04/22 but with a reduced length.
i'd like to get clarification on this. And also if there's a better way in WED to handle this case.
UK AIP link: https://www.aurora.nats.co.uk/htmlAIP/Publications/2024-05-16-AIRAC/html/eAIP/EG-AD-2.EGSS-en-GB.html#AD-2.EGSS
Stefan Frank August 18, 2024 8:43 AM
with the XP 12.1.2beta release users are now confused to see 04C/22C in the FMS which is not an actual runway.
ChrixFlyer August 18, 2024 10:27 AM
They might be confused, but that's how the current situation at London Stansted looks like...
There are procedures available for both 04/22 and 04C/22C. No short-term solution available I'm afraid unless NATS revises this situation.
this is due to the 'logical only' rwy 04C/22C which sits on top of the physical rwy 04/22. See https://www.aurora.nats.co.uk/htmlAIP/Publications/2024-05-16-AIRAC/html/eAIP/EG-AD-2.EGSS-en-GB.html#AD-2.EGSS
My initial submission with rwy 04/22 only got rejected.