__v__ reported issue XSG-1995: New Airport Code Request on October 1, 2016 7:31 PM
Closed
  • __v__ October 1, 2016 7:33 PM


    Google maps URL: @45.0733446,-77.8808297,1086m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x4cd47b56754675a5:0x5bd2c5aae9c601aa!8m2!3d45.0558574!4d-77.8548814?hl=en" class="external-link" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Bancroft,+ON/@45.0733446,-77.8808297,1086m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x4cd47b56754675a5:0x5bd2c5aae9c601aa!8m2!3d45.0558574!4d-77.8548814?hl=en

  • Jennifer Roberts October 7, 2016 12:30 PM

    Since there isn't a real ICAO code for this airport, I suggested XCYCNW3 to follow our guidelines (even though it is a mouthful):

    "The format for designing these codes should be: X (for fictitious code) + country ICAO prefix + IATA or local aviation authority code."

    The local code CNW3 can be added to the metadata in WED 1.5 and used for searching as well.

  • __v__ October 7, 2016 6:44 PM


    Ok, thanks. That sounds reasonable if I can add CNW3 to the metadata. Just wondering if this is a new format? If you look at my previous tickets you will see I've added a number of codes in the past for Canada that just used the TLID (Transport Canada Location IDentifier). Will those get updated eventually or just grandfathered?

  • Jennifer Roberts October 12, 2016 10:58 AM

    We finalized this format as our official policy last year, but there were definitely some airports approved before (and possibly even after) that don't match it. It's just a way to create a unique code for X-Plane in the case that an airport gets an actual ICAO code later on. We can change the front facing code, but the original X-Plane code will be permanent.

You must be logged in to participate in the discussion