pierrecor
commented
in reference to scenery pack
96296on June 18, 2023 8:12 PM
On all the maps I could get, the runway's magnetic heading is 312, which makes it 31 and in reverse 13, unless I am missing something. There is a marking on the runway of 34, but that is totally off course. There is not much info on this airport except that one article states the runways as 16/34, which will move the runway at a tangent from what is on the maps. Perhaps if I can understand the validation rule, I'll be able to figure it out. This was one of the GW airports to create. Pierre
This artist recreated a scenery that is completely wrong, with an asphalt surface and the like, where it was designed with heuristics and all the 3D components that need to be. I have originally designed the airfield, but there was a conflict between Google Earth and the runway numbers. Please unlock the scenery and if possible, revert to the previous scenery for me to download and fix it/
You must be logged in to participate in the discussion
On all the maps I could get, the runway's magnetic heading is 312, which makes it 31 and in reverse 13, unless I am missing something. There is a marking on the runway of 34, but that is totally off course. There is not much info on this airport except that one article states the runways as 16/34, which will move the runway at a tangent from what is on the maps. Perhaps if I can understand the validation rule, I'll be able to figure it out. This was one of the GW airports to create. Pierre
This artist recreated a scenery that is completely wrong, with an asphalt surface and the like, where it was designed with heuristics and all the 3D components that need to be. I have originally designed the airfield, but there was a conflict between Google Earth and the runway numbers. Please unlock the scenery and if possible, revert to the previous scenery for me to download and fix it/