CatonaPC
commented
in reference to scenery pack
91171on June 3, 2022 1:23 PM
This air strip was somewhat unique for me, as excluding part of the .ags near the runway, actually resulted in a large area being omitted for several blocks either side of the runway. Obviously, this didn't look good. My solution was to copy part of it from the default scenery, and add bits manually near the runway. As far as my experience carries me, this is the only way I could work out how to make it look filled in, again. I kept the airport boundary tight near the airport and this uploaded, error free, to Gateway. What is not clear to me, is whether the autogen scenery outside of the airport boundary will be accepted by you. I know forests never are. I'm hoping that given that I have included the appropriate exclusion, that my submission will be okay. However, if not, I'd be happy to fix if I am informed of a method to do this. At the moment, my thinking is, that what I did is the only way it can be done.
Rick
CatonaPC
commented
in reference to scenery pack
91171on June 25, 2022 11:43 PM
Please read my comments of June 3. I have tested this, and the scenery works fine. I don't know how else this can be done without it ending up looking devoid of housing for blocks on either side. I will probably release this as a standalone scenery package.
You must be logged in to participate in the discussion
This air strip was somewhat unique for me, as excluding part of the .ags near the runway, actually resulted in a large area being omitted for several blocks either side of the runway. Obviously, this didn't look good. My solution was to copy part of it from the default scenery, and add bits manually near the runway. As far as my experience carries me, this is the only way I could work out how to make it look filled in, again. I kept the airport boundary tight near the airport and this uploaded, error free, to Gateway. What is not clear to me, is whether the autogen scenery outside of the airport boundary will be accepted by you. I know forests never are. I'm hoping that given that I have included the appropriate exclusion, that my submission will be okay. However, if not, I'd be happy to fix if I am informed of a method to do this. At the moment, my thinking is, that what I did is the only way it can be done.
Rick
Please read my comments of June 3. I have tested this, and the scenery works fine. I don't know how else this can be done without it ending up looking devoid of housing for blocks on either side. I will probably release this as a standalone scenery package.