XSG-15143

Recommendations for more realistic scenery at SAME

Closed

Scenery bug report

Reported by:
 Diego Baboun on February 9, 2024 10:43 PM

Assigned to:
 Jan Vogel

None of the runways have centerline lights in real life
RWY36 has EASA Precision markings in real life
RWY18 uses US Precision markings in real life
None of the runways have TDZ lights
Hopefully you can do this quick fixes

  • Jan Vogel February 10, 2024 12:00 PM

    No airports will be fixed by Laminar Research. All airport work is done by volunteer Scenery Gateway artists.

  • ecallr February 10, 2024 5:22 PM


    Runway has center line as defined in AIP publication I add.
    EASA and US precision markings no represent diferences in visual WED definition.
    TDZ as published in AIP (edge of runway) do not work in WED. TDZ is the best aproximation I can.

  • Diego Baboun February 10, 2024 5:51 PM


    Just checked my 2 sources (Argentina AIP and Navigraph) and it does have centerline lights my bad. But still EASA in RWY36 is more accurate in my testings in wed and in sim view (TDZ more accurate). And didn't find anything of tdz lights in my sources. Check page 5 AD 2.14 LUCES DE APROXIMACIÓN Y DE PISTA / APPROACH AND RUNWAY LIGHTING (Argentina AIP)

  • Jan Vogel June 25, 2025 3:12 PM

    I agree that there should be not touchdown zone lighting - I have removed it.

    I have also changed the precision marking for runway 36 to EASA.

    I will change the status of this report to “fixed” when my submission has become accepted and recommended.

Airport Identifier SAME
Scenery Pack ID 100470