XSG-15445
Runway threshold displacement not matching CIFP data
Closed
Scenery bug report
Reported by:
PL4
on June 8, 2024 2:12 PM
Assigned to:
Philipp Ringler
Applies to both rwy ends. Moving thresholds and the whole rest of the airport to match the "CIFP"-markings and also changing the length to 7236 ft (according to Jeppesen 11-DEC-20 sheet 10-9) it is turning out that all assets match the openstreetmap SlippeMap much better than with ESRi (as actually is with ID 102207).
Conclusion: CIFP heading matches osm data very well, but threshols are neither shown on sattelite imageries nor mentioned or shon on the Jeppesen sheet.
Attached: modified version as described above
Philipp Ringler June 19, 2024 3:36 PM
The chart you are referring to is four years old.
CIFP data matches current Jeppesen charts of May 16th, 2024.
PL4 June 19, 2024 8:25 PM
Thanks for the hint. Just got the Jepp. update