Manchester Intl

ronb62 commented on August 24, 2017 4:07 AM

Is there a list of "excluded" airports anywhere? The only one I saw was dated Feb in Notams and EGCC isn't listed. A little more explanation as to why EGCC is excluded would be nice. Thanks

An unknown user reported issue XSG-4719: Trafiic flows in reference to scenery pack 58286 on March 10, 2018 12:02 AM
Closed

Seems he has departures and arrival for 5l and 5r within same wind config same with 23l and r

Julian Lockwood reported issue XSG-10064: Test Bug Report in reference to scenery pack 76061 on April 16, 2020 5:09 PM
Closed

This is just a test.

jimkeir reported issue XSG-10312: Flows are incorrect - no ru... in reference to scenery pack 76061 on May 11, 2020 9:20 AM
Closed

No runway accepts HeavyJet types in either flow, but parking exists for these and the real airport handles them.

  • Jan Vogel March 9, 2021 8:47 AM

    GlosterIR has uploaded an update to EGCC that I believe will fix this as well. Thanks!

Willfoxuk reported issue XSG-10952: Gate/stand numbers need upd... in reference to scenery pack 76061 on October 3, 2020 8:59 AM
Closed

Manchester airport has had a redevelopment in real life, leaving many of the gate numbers now incorrect in the scenery. For example the new gates 47 - 58 in real life, are numbered at approximately 150 etc in the scenery. Also the new pier near terminal 2, real gates 811,809, 807 do not exist in the scenery.

  • Jan Vogel October 3, 2020 10:34 AM


    I know this airport has been developed by Julian - and is currently locked out from the general public working on it. Maybe this restriction could be lifted? I know Julian is really busy with lots of things...

  • Julian Lockwood October 3, 2020 5:59 PM

    Yep - I’ve lifted the restriction on this airport - the community is free to make the necessary updates.

  • Jan Vogel March 11, 2021 3:22 PM

    GlosterIR has updated the airport and it is (pending acceptance) going to fix this issue upon next scenery injection update.

Goodman74 reported issue XSG-11577: Ramp number on minimap not... in reference to scenery pack 83043 on March 16, 2021 7:05 AM
Closed

"minimap" - aerodrome chart, which used for select load position when select a scenery.
By Example: Terminal 1 PIER B R16 in reality must be R2, or R14 is R4 or R12 is R6, R4 is R1 (some ones corresponds).
Based on Jeppesen P10-9A.
P.s>all other very nice. Thanks for work.

  • David C March 16, 2021 8:55 AM


    Good spot. I have refreshed and checked all the ramp start numbering to match the ground signage, which was already consistent with the Jepp parking chart.

  • David C April 8, 2021 8:56 AM


    The updated scenery pack has been approved. This bug report can now be closed.

highpeakrider commented on September 5, 2023 12:13 PM

Could I ask why the runways may appear flat where in real terms 23R has a hump in it? Could this be ORBX scenery impacting it or is this how xplane provides it?

Thanks

marcoloz commented in reference to scenery pack 106124 on March 27, 2025 11:38 AM

The new terminal is missing

LBIA commented in reference to scenery pack 84322 on May 5, 2025 11:59 AM

Ramp start static aircraft airlines should be more accurate. There's no Jet2, Ryanair, EasyJet, TUI, Singapore, BA, etc to be seen, and Alitalia don't fly to MAN. Scenery-wise it's brilliant and very well detailed but I'm unable to make this change in WED

You must be logged in to participate in the discussion